Leadership LibraryApril 8, 2026
The Problem Your Team Keeps Solving
When an issue repeatedly returns, its recurrence becomes useful information about the system producing it.

Every leadership team has an issue that seems to return with a new name. The team addresses it, progress follows, and several months later a familiar pattern appears again.
Recurrence does not mean the team failed. It often means the immediate concern was handled while the condition producing it remained in place. That distinction opens a more productive line of inquiry.
Three patterns worth examining
Recurring team issues frequently point to one of three structural conditions:
• Unclear decision ownership. Two functions believe they own the same decision, or each assumes the other does. The issue appears as poor communication, but the team needs clearer authority.
• Competing measures of success. Leaders are rewarded for outcomes that pull in different directions. The tension appears personal even when each leader is acting rationally.
• A missing forum. The organization has no reliable place for a certain kind of decision, so the conversation moves into side meetings, escalation paths, or informal workarounds.
In each case, asking the team to try harder may create a temporary improvement. Changing the condition gives the team a better chance to create a lasting one.
Let the last solution teach you something
A useful question is: What changed the last time this issue improved, and what changed again before it returned?
If the team created a temporary workaround, the answer may be a clearer role, decision process, or operating agreement. If a structural change was introduced and later reversed, explore what pressure caused the reversal. That pressure is often closer to the real work.
Why an outside perspective helps
Structural patterns are difficult to see from inside because every leader in the room is participating in them. Each person sees a valid part of the system, usually from the position their role requires them to hold.
Systemic team coaching brings those perspectives into one view. It helps the team strengthen communication while also examining decision rights, incentives, relationships, and the wider organizational context shaping that communication.
A better measure of progress
A useful session can generate energy and insight. The stronger test comes later: Has the team changed what produces the issue? Are decisions clearer? Are the right conversations happening in the right room? Does the improvement continue when attention moves elsewhere?
When the answer is yes, the team has done more than solve the problem in front of them. They have increased their capacity to solve what comes next.
Find the pattern beneath the recurring problem
Systemic team coaching helps leadership teams see what is shaping their performance and change the conditions that keep important issues in motion.
More from the library
October 13, 2026A New Executive's First 90 Days Belong To The Whole TeamOriginally published on Forbes. When a new executive arrives, the whole team changes. Here’s why the first 90 days should focus on the team’s shared agreements, not just the new leader.Read the article
September 30, 2026Why Your Dyad Isn't Working (and It's Not the People)When a physician and administrative partnership stalls, the instinct is to look at personalities. The more useful question is what the system is asking the partnership to do.Read the article
September 6, 2026The Hidden ROI of Executive CoachingWhy the greatest return appears in the performance of the systemRead the article
Start with what is actually happening
A discovery call is 30 minutes. We will ask what is happening, who it involves, and what would have to change for it to count as solved.
